Back at School, SV Students May Have to Mask Up Under COVID Plan
Under a revised district health and safety plan approved by the Saucon Valley School Board last week–following a special meeting that lasted more than five hours–students in the district will be required to wear masks again if community transmission of COVID-19 in Northampton County reaches levels that are deemed “substantial” or “high.”

Under a revised district health and safety plan approved by the Saucon Valley School Board last weekāfrom among five possible plans and following a special meeting that lasted more than five hoursāstudents in the district will be required to wear masks again if community transmission of COVID-19 in Northampton County reaches levels that are deemed āsubstantialā or āhigh.ā
Saucon Valley students and teachers returned to classes Monday with the option to wear face masks under the updated guidelines (see below for the complete updated guidelines), which include four transmission tiers that are defined according to the rolling average number of cases per 7-day period, per 100,000 residents:
- Low: 0-9 cases (7-day rolling average)
- Moderate: 10-49 cases (7-day rolling average)
- Substantial: 50-100 cases (7-day rolling average)
- High: 100+ cases (7-day rolling average)
Currently, Northampton County has a 7-day rolling average of approximately 28 new COVID-19 cases per dayāor 198 cases per weekāper 100,000 residents, which means Saucon Valley students returned to class Monday in the āHighā tier, and wearing masks.
With a population of approximately 312,000 and approximately 87 new cases per day, as of Aug. 24 Northampton County had the fifth highest average daily number of new cases in Pennsylvania. (Bedford County, in south central Pennsylvania, has a slightly higher average although its population is considerably smaller than Northampton Countyās is.)
Under the districtās updated guidance, masks are optional for students and staff when the case numbers are such that the countyās transmission rate is considered low or moderate, except in āfully masked classrooms where students and staff are required to wear a mask.ā District superintendent Dr. Craig Butler said there are one or two fully masked classes per grade level in kindergarten through sixth grade. The number of students in each class ranges from being āin the mid teens to the mid-high twenties,ā he said.
If the countyās community transmission rate reaches the substantial level, all students and staff in kindergarten through sixth grade are required to wear masks under the plan, with masking optional for students and staff in seventh through 12th grade. If community transmission reaches the high level, masking will be required for all students and staff.
Since the start of the pandemic in March 2020, the highest the daily new case average has reached is 93.9 new cases per day, per 100,000 Northampton County residents (or approximately 287 new cases per day total), which was on Dec. 10, 2020, according to CovidActNow.org, a website which uses statistical data compiled by the New York Times.
All students as well as bus drivers are required to wear masks on school district-owned transportation, under the approved health and safety plan. There is an exception for a student who has a health or medical exemption submitted through standard district procedures, and drivers may forgo masking if there are no students on their bus.
In response to a question, Butler said in an email that the specific thresholds the districtās plan includes āare aligned with CDC guidance.ā
He said the district will review case numbers weekly and, ā(he) will communicate with parents weekly as well in the case that masking requirements change.ā
He also confirmed there are no special provisions in place for COVID mitigation or testing among student-athletes, including those who play contact sports such as football.
Although Saucon Valleyās new mask policy is less restrictive than those in place or under consideration in some school districts throughout the regionāincluding the neighboring Southern Lehigh School District, whose board of school directors will consider universal masking until at least late September Monday at 7:30 p.m., per their meeting agendaāit is more restrictive than an earlier version of the health and safety plan, which was approved by the school board July 27; the same day the U.S. Centers for Disease Control updated earlier guidance by backtracking and recommending the use of masks indoors, even by vaccinated individuals.
Under that earlier approved version of the plan, masking was optional for all students and staff, regardless of the rate of COVID transmission occurring in the community.
Since late July caseloads and infection rates have climbed, at least in part due to declining vaccination rates in Northampton County and around the nation. The increasing predominance of the more highly-transmissable Delta variant has also played a role in the start of a fourth wave of the pandemic, health experts say.
%CODE267%
Despite the worsening statistics, many parents who spoke at the Saucon Valley School Boardās lengthy Aug. 16 meeting criticized any type of mandatory masking for students, for a variety of reasons.
The criticism was also in spite of the fact that masks were required all last year, when a statewide mask mandate implemented by former state health secretary Dr. Rachel Levine and signed by Gov. Tom Wolf was in place. That mandate expired June 28, and Wolf has said he is leaving COVID mitigation strategies to the discretion of individual districts.
In the meantime, much opposition to masking has erupted, particularly in public schools.
āI want to highlight continued confirmation of the following,ā said Lower Saucon resident Lynn Kasper. āMasks are ineffective. Masks have repeatedly been demonstrated as harmful. Masks are investigational medical therapy. Theyāre approved for emergency authorization use only, which means that informed consent is necessary by the wearer. That is the law.ā
Similar claims have been repeatedly debunked since at least February, when Reuters reported on viral social media posts filled with misinformation about the use of masks.
In the article, āFact check: Mandatory mask wearing is not a āwar crimeā that violates the Nuremberg Code,ā Reuters quotes Dr. Robert D. Truog, MD, Frances Glessner Lee Professor of Medical Ethics, Anaesthesiology & Pediatrics and Director of the Center for Bioethics at Harvard Medical School, as saying:
The claims that policies mandating masks could be seen as a violation of either the Nuremberg Code or the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights are absolutely false. These policies are neither medical research (nor) medical interventions. They are public health interventions. Just like laws that prohibit smoking on planes or in restaurants, these policies are intended to protect innocent individuals from being exposed to potentially harmful toxins or viruses that could be spread by others.
Kasper claimed there have been āhundreds of mask studies related to the influenza transmission done over several decadesā and that āit is a well-established fact that masks do not stop viruses.ā She further claimed that ācloth face masks actually increase influenza-linked illness; bacteria are 50 times larger than virus particles (and) as such virus particles can enter through mask pores, yet bacteria remain trapped inside the mask, resulting in the mask-wearer continually exposed to the bacteria.ā
An October 2020 story published in The AtlanticĀ noted that āevery kind of face mask has been proved, in study after study, to slow the spread of COVID-19, with N95s being the most effective. To name just one example, two stylists worked at a hair salon in Missouri while infected with the coronavirus, but none of the 139 clients they saw got sick, because everyone wore a mask.ā And Reuters reported in a āfact checkā story published earlier this month that a viral news story about masks purportedly endangering children was based on a research letter published by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Pediatrics in June that was later retracted because the editors of the journal determined that āthe authors did not provide sufficiently convincing evidence to resolve these issues, as determined by editorial evaluation and additional scientific review.ā
Kasper accused the board of āengaging in (a) whole-school clinical experimental trial.ā
Ed Novak, a Hellertown resident, told the board it should listen to Kasper over leading national health experts such as Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Chief Medical Advisor to the President Dr. Anthony Fauci, about whom he repeated a claim that has been proven to lack context.
āShe had facts and figures and studies done. She had the real information. Not what somebody said,ā Novak said of Kasper, who didnāt identify herself as a doctor or scientist. āDr. Fauci said, āmasks donāt work.ā The masks donāt work. The viruses go through them. Everybody knows it, but theyāre not listening. Theyāre either American or Communist.ā
Novak then questioned the politics of the board members in attendance, holding up his hand and moving it across the room in the direction of the board as he said, āI can tell by looking at you which ones are Americans and which ones are Communists.ā
Jennifer Schmell, of Hellertown, said the board should side with the majority of parents who took a parent health and safety survey in which she said 70 percent of respondents said they donāt want their children to be required to wear masks. She said that with the exception of Allentown, Bethlehem and possibly Easton, most area school districts are implementing optional masking for students.
Not all parents favored an approach prioritizing personal freedom over the recommendations of public health authorities, however.
Lawrence Opthof of Lower Saucon Township urged the board to āfollow the science thatās spelled out by the CDC.ā
āWho wants to say my kid is unlucky enough to get really sick and end up in the hospital and on a respirator or whatever happens?ā he asked. āEven if you beat the disease thereās a good chance youāre going to have a lot of problems afterwards. Who wants to expose their kids to that?ā
He said failure to follow the science could also expose the district to legal ramifications.
āIf somebody gets good and sick and youāre not following the CDC or the science, somebodyās going to sue somebody. Thatās what itās going to come down to,ā Opthof said. āBecause when youāre talking about the kids getting hurt, youāre talking a serious issue here.ā
Hellertown resident Donald Carpenter told the board that, āthe way the world works now, everyoneās going to have their own set of facts.ā
āThe most important thing that I could relay to you today, is that no one in this room is a qualified medical expert, and no one you talk to has the range and breadth of experience as the nationās top health experts, and so while it is important to keep these decisions local, the CDC has made it very clear what their recommendations are: It is universal masking. It is screening for sports,ā he said.
Linda Salmon, a parent from Lower Saucon Township, suggested that students under 12 be masked āuntil the situation changesā because they are unvaccinated and because of the rise of the Delta variant.
āWhile thatās inconvenient, itās uncomfortable, itās not life-threatening, and it protects them as well as anyone that they could go home to and bring the virus to,ā she said.
āIn regards to the 12-and-up population, Iād like you to consider asking for a ādeclaration of vaccinationā status,ā Salmon told the board. āThose who are vaccinatedāthey can go unmaskedāand maybe have a little more freedom and privileges, and those who are unvaccinated have to be masked. Not only does that protect them, but it has the added benefit of incentivizing for people to go out and get these shots. I think itās a win-win.ā
She added that she had to tell the district the vaccination status of her child who attends high school because they participate in sports, and said she doesnāt understand āwhy the idea canāt translate to the larger population.ā
Many Saucon Valley students remain unvaccinated because the vaccine has not yet been approved by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration for use in children under the age of 12.
It is not known how many students 12 and older are vaccinated in Saucon Valley or anywhere, due to privacy laws, but according to county-wide statistics approximately 62 percent of all Northampton County residents 12 and older are at least partially vaccinated.
The next Saucon Valley School Board meeting will be held Tuesday, Aug. 24 at 7 p.m. in the high school Audion room. The meeting will also be streamed live on YouTube, where meeting recordings are uploaded to the districtās channel.
Among the items highlighted on a draft version of the agenda is a discussion regarding students utilizing the school cafeteria under the health and safety plan.
To view the complete agenda, click here.
Below: The version of the health & safety plan that was adopted by the Saucon Valley School Board at its Aug. 16, 2021 meeting.







